<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initial GFF parser for Biopython</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Chapman</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugo,
Thanks again. I checked in fixes so the GenBank to GFF conversion should be cleaner and be handled by genometools:

https://github.com/chapmanb/bcbb/commit/540b030c40e17a6a76b173aadefa8beb56a660f0

let me know if you run into other issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo,<br />
Thanks again. I checked in fixes so the GenBank to GFF conversion should be cleaner and be handled by genometools:</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/chapmanb/bcbb/commit/540b030c40e17a6a76b173aadefa8beb56a660f0" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/chapmanb/bcbb/commit/540b030c40e17a6a76b173aadefa8beb56a660f0</a></p>
<p>let me know if you run into other issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macabro22</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macabro22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure Brad. Here is the reply from Gnometools&#039; author Sasha: http://genometools.lighthouseapp.com/projects/17855/tickets/61-error-parsing-gff3-file

The tp53 file on github: https://github.com/mercutio22/biopython/blob/master/Tests/sample_files/tp53.gff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Brad. Here is the reply from Gnometools&#8217; author Sasha: <a href="http://genometools.lighthouseapp.com/projects/17855/tickets/61-error-parsing-gff3-file" rel="nofollow">http://genometools.lighthouseapp.com/projects/17855/tickets/61-error-parsing-gff3-file</a></p>
<p>The tp53 file on github: <a href="https://github.com/mercutio22/biopython/blob/master/Tests/sample_files/tp53.gff" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mercutio22/biopython/blob/master/Tests/sample_files/tp53.gff</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Chapman</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugo,
Thanks for the report. Would you be able to send along some of &#039;tp53.gff&#039;? From the error message it sounds like I&#039;ll need at least the first 3 lines. If you could post this on GitHub I can take a look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo,<br />
Thanks for the report. Would you be able to send along some of &#8216;tp53.gff&#8217;? From the error message it sounds like I&#8217;ll need at least the first 3 lines. If you could post this on GitHub I can take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macabro22</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macabro22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brad. Thanks for your work.

I trying your GFF parser software to write gff files from genbank files and subsequently use AnnotatationSketch from genometools.org to draw some schematics.

They have an online demo here: http://genometools.org/cgi-bin/annotationsketch_demo.cgi
Asuming that tool is parsing GFFs properly you could use that to test if your parser is working ok.

I tried here and it seems to fail with gt.core.error.GTError: GenomeTools error: could not parse number &#039;.&#039; on line 3 in file &#039;/home/merc/gitcode/mirna-django/src/scripts/tp53.gff&#039;

The gff3 parsed from the biopearl tool bp_genbank2gff3 works so I am asuming your parser put a dot in the wrong place.

Let me know if I can help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad. Thanks for your work.</p>
<p>I trying your GFF parser software to write gff files from genbank files and subsequently use AnnotatationSketch from genometools.org to draw some schematics.</p>
<p>They have an online demo here: <a href="http://genometools.org/cgi-bin/annotationsketch_demo.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://genometools.org/cgi-bin/annotationsketch_demo.cgi</a><br />
Asuming that tool is parsing GFFs properly you could use that to test if your parser is working ok.</p>
<p>I tried here and it seems to fail with gt.core.error.GTError: GenomeTools error: could not parse number &#8216;.&#8217; on line 3 in file &#8216;/home/merc/gitcode/mirna-django/src/scripts/tp53.gff&#8217;</p>
<p>The gff3 parsed from the biopearl tool bp_genbank2gff3 works so I am asuming your parser put a dot in the wrong place.</p>
<p>Let me know if I can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Chapman</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve;
Yes it supports the &#039;##FASTA&#039; directive so you can include FASTA in the GFF file. However, better practice is to keep the FASTA and GFF separate, since you&#039;ll likely need FASTA files in programs where you don&#039;t want to parse it out of a GFF file first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve;<br />
Yes it supports the &#8216;##FASTA&#8217; directive so you can include FASTA in the GFF file. However, better practice is to keep the FASTA and GFF separate, since you&#8217;ll likely need FASTA files in programs where you don&#8217;t want to parse it out of a GFF file first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Moss</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Moss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reply Brad!

Does the module also support inline FASTA? I notice from some parsers, particularly for GFF2 that you have to load the FASTA and GFF files separately.

I&#039;d like to be able to parse the GFF file and then have access to the sequence for the particular annotation objects.

Cheers,

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Brad!</p>
<p>Does the module also support inline FASTA? I notice from some parsers, particularly for GFF2 that you have to load the FASTA and GFF files separately.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to be able to parse the GFF file and then have access to the sequence for the particular annotation objects.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Chapman</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve;
Glad you are interested in using it. The latest documentation for use is on the Biopython website:

http://biopython.org/wiki/GFF_Parsing

The module works great for GFF data I&#039;ve been using in my regular research. If you have any questions or find GFF that is giving it issues, definitely let me know.

Thanks,
Brad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve;<br />
Glad you are interested in using it. The latest documentation for use is on the Biopython website:</p>
<p><a href="http://biopython.org/wiki/GFF_Parsing" rel="nofollow">http://biopython.org/wiki/GFF_Parsing</a></p>
<p>The module works great for GFF data I&#8217;ve been using in my regular research. If you have any questions or find GFF that is giving it issues, definitely let me know.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gawbul</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gawbul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brad,

Have the GFF parsers come on much since this post? I&#039;m hoping to use BioPython and PyCogent for comparative genomics analyses and would like to write some wrappers to pull data in from multiple genome databases into GFF3, so I can work with the data locally in a common format!

Here&#039;s a post I made on BioStar http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/3566/how-can-i-unify-genome-data-from-different-sources

Cheers,

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad,</p>
<p>Have the GFF parsers come on much since this post? I&#8217;m hoping to use BioPython and PyCogent for comparative genomics analyses and would like to write some wrappers to pull data in from multiple genome databases into GFF3, so I can work with the data locally in a common format!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a post I made on BioStar <a href="http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/3566/how-can-i-unify-genome-data-from-different-sources" rel="nofollow">http://biostar.stackexchange.com/questions/3566/how-can-i-unify-genome-data-from-different-sources</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Chapman</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giovanni;
No problem. Hopefully we will get the module in good enough shape that it&#039;ll be ready the next time you need to parse GFF.

Thanks for the suggested patches for the tests on github. I&#039;ve got a couple of questions for you about your style; it differs a bit from what I&#039;ve done in the past on testing. Why do you prefer to have the defined stuff be class attributes instead of just sticking them in the setUp function? Is it because of performance concerns?

Also, I noticed your doctest note. I always felt the unittest approach is more natural for development; I write the tests as I write the code, formalizing areas where I imagine errors sneaking in during future development. Why do you prefer doctest?

I&#039;d like to try and sync this with Biopython git when it is finalized; it will hopefully help me learn git more thoroughly. I&#039;m still getting over my fears of branching and merging from many years of CVS/SVN work.

Thanks again for the feedback,
Brad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giovanni;<br />
No problem. Hopefully we will get the module in good enough shape that it&#8217;ll be ready the next time you need to parse GFF.</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggested patches for the tests on github. I&#8217;ve got a couple of questions for you about your style; it differs a bit from what I&#8217;ve done in the past on testing. Why do you prefer to have the defined stuff be class attributes instead of just sticking them in the setUp function? Is it because of performance concerns?</p>
<p>Also, I noticed your doctest note. I always felt the unittest approach is more natural for development; I write the tests as I write the code, formalizing areas where I imagine errors sneaking in during future development. Why do you prefer doctest?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to try and sync this with Biopython git when it is finalized; it will hopefully help me learn git more thoroughly. I&#8217;m still getting over my fears of branching and merging from many years of CVS/SVN work.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the feedback,<br />
Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalloliogm</title>
		<link>http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dalloliogm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/initial-gff-parser-for-biopython/#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi,
thank you for doing this.. I have used gff a lot during my master&#039;s project, but now I am using different formats.

I just wanted to say that if you want, you can use the unofficial biopython migration branch on github to keep this code synchronized with the biopython repository.

You&#039;ll have to fork the biopython branch here:
- http://github.com/biopython/biopython/network
and push your changes to your forked branch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
thank you for doing this.. I have used gff a lot during my master&#8217;s project, but now I am using different formats.</p>
<p>I just wanted to say that if you want, you can use the unofficial biopython migration branch on github to keep this code synchronized with the biopython repository.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to fork the biopython branch here:<br />
- <a href="http://github.com/biopython/biopython/network" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/biopython/biopython/network</a><br />
and push your changes to your forked branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
